Advertise
- Debashree Patra
Debashree Patra
- Reviewed by:
Sohrab KhawasSohrab is a passionate cryptocurrency news writer with over five years of experience covering the industry. He keeps a keen interest in blockchain technology and its potential to revolutionize finance. Whether he's trading or writing, Sohrab always keeps his finger on the pulse of the crypto world, using his expertise to deliver informative and engaging articles that educate and inspire. When he's not analyzing the markets, Sohrab indulges in his hobbies of graphic design, minimal design or listening to his favorite hip-hop tunes.
- Dec 18, 2025 08:01 UTC
-
MSCI Proposal Could Trigger $15B Crypto Sell-Off in Public Companies
MSCI’s proposed index rule could force billions in selling of crypto-linked stocks, with spillover risks for Bitcoin and broader digital asset markets.
Analysts warn MSCI’s 50% digital asset threshold may boost volatility for firms like MicroStrategy and Coinbase, impacting both equities and BTC prices.
A proposed rule change by MSCI is quickly becoming a major talking point across traditional finance and crypto markets. Analysts warn the move could trigger billions of dollars in forced selling, not just in stocks, but potentially spilling into Bitcoin itself. At the center of the debate is how crypto-heavy public companies are treated inside global equity indexes.
What Is MSCI Proposing and Why Does It Matter?
MSCI, one of the world’s most influential index providers, is considering excluding companies that hold more than 50% of their assets in digital assets from its Global Investable Market Indexes. The proposal was first floated in October and is still under consultation, with a final decision expected by January 15, 2026. If approved, changes would likely take effect in February 2026.
This is not a minor technical tweak. MSCI indexes guide trillions of dollars in institutional capital, meaning any reclassification can instantly reshape market flows.
Why Is the 50% Threshold So Controversial?
The core issue is how MSCI defines risk. The proposed rule relies purely on balance-sheet composition, not on how a company actually operates. Critics argue this rigid threshold ignores the reality of digital asset treasury strategies.
For firms like MicroStrategy, which holds over 671,268 BTC, Bitcoin is treated as a long-term treasury asset rather than a speculative trade. Yet under MSCI’s framework, a rise in Bitcoin’s price alone could push such companies past the 50% mark and lead to index removal, even if their business model hasn’t changed.
Forced Selling is possible, if..
Analysts believe the risk is real. Around 39 publicly listed companies with heavy crypto exposure, worth roughly $113 billion combined, are currently included in MSCI-linked indexes. If excluded, index-tracking ETFs and mutual funds would be forced to sell these stocks automatically.
Estimates suggest this could drive between $10 billion and $15 billion in outflows. JPMorgan has separately warned that excluding MicroStrategy alone could trigger about $2.8 billion in selling, highlighting how concentrated and sudden the impact could be.
Crypto-Linked Stocks Could Amplify BTC Volatility
Companies heavily invested in Bitcoin could push BTC markets into turbulence if equity selling intensifies. Analysts warn of a self-reinforcing cycle: falling share prices lead to more index exclusions, forced selling, and heightened volatility.
Institutional Crypto Adoption Could Slow
Beyond short-term volatility, industry participants worry the rule could slow institutional crypto adoption and undermine index neutrality, a core principle of passive investing. It may also invite regulatory scrutiny as policymakers continue debating how digital assets should be classified.
Even though the final decision is still months away, uncertainty is already creeping in. Stocks like MicroStrategy, Coinbase, and Bitcoin miners could face heightened volatility as markets price in the risk. The outcome could shape not only crypto-linked equities but also how digital assets fit into corporate balance sheets worldwide.
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!
Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.
FAQs
Yes. Companies could reduce reported digital-asset exposure by raising cash, issuing debt, or shifting assets into operating subsidiaries, even if their core strategy remains unchanged. Such moves would be driven by index eligibility rather than business fundamentals, potentially distorting capital allocation decisions.
Potentially. Firms may reconsider how and where digital assets are held or reported, especially if accounting classifications affect index treatment. This could accelerate lobbying for clearer global accounting standards for cryptocurrencies through bodies like the IASB or FASB.
If MSCI adjusts the threshold, adds grace periods, or introduces qualitative criteria, immediate market disruption could be reduced. However, prolonged uncertainty may still keep valuations volatile until final index rules are locked in and implemented.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Yes 
No 
