Ripple vs SEC: Why is the Summary Judgement Stretching On? Deaton Provides Insights

In the ongoing legal battle between Ripple Labs and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding the digital asset XRP, lawyer john e deaton john e deaton john EntrepreneurHostMarket Analyst has shed light on the timeline for a summary judgment in the case.

However, the prolonged duration of the lawsuit has caused unease within the crypto community, sparking a discussion on social media.

What does Deaton have to say this time around? Let’s dive in.

A Communication Breakdown

The discussion began when Twitter user Mr. Huber referred to a statement made by Ripple Labs CEO last year. Garlinghouse had suggested that a decision on the lawsuit would be reached within a few “weeks.” This statement, combined with earlier claims by pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton that the case was nearing its conclusion, has led to inconsistencies in the information provided to the public.

“People claiming: “This is normal. That it takes so long is perfectly normal,” you cannot at the same time claim “Yeah, this case takes much more time than anyone could ever have imagined! But you have to consider this case is the case of a century! MONUMENTAL!” Please be consistent.,” Huber said on Twitter.

Mr. Huber pointed out these discrepancies and called for consistency in the communication surrounding the case.

John Deaton Calls for Context

In response, lawyer John Deaton explained that, as a frequent speaker, he sometimes needs to be more precise with his statements. He emphasized that quoting him out of context would be misleading and urged Mr. Huber to consider all his previous statements regarding the potential timeline for a summary judgment in the Ripple vs. SEC case, rather than focusing on a single word or statement.

Setting the Record Straight

Surprisingly, lawyer John Deaton recalled different timelines for summary judgments issued by Judge Analisa Torres, who is presiding over the Ripple vs. SEC case. He cited instances when the judge ruled on summary judgment simultaneously with her well-known Daubert ruling, as well as cases where there was a time difference of 2, 4, or 6 months between the two rulings.

Deaton acknowledged his mistake in assuming that the public interest in the case would expedite its resolution. He expressed surprise that the lawsuit had extended beyond June, highlighting the complexity of the legal process and the unpredictable nature of such proceedings.

At the end of the day, here we are once again, keenly waiting for the judgement! Any moment now, right?