News
  • Vignesh S G
    author-profile

    Vignesh S G right arrow

    Author

    Vignesh is a young journalist with a decade of experience. A proud alumnus of IIJNM, Bengaluru, he spent six years as a Sub-Editor for a leading business magazine, published from Kerala. His interest in futuristic technologies took him to a US-based software company specialising in Web3, Blockchain and AI. This stint inspired him to view the future of journalism through the lens of next generation technologies. Now, he covers the crypto scene for Coinpedia, uncovering a vibrant new world where technology and journalism converge.

    • 2 minutes read

    Warren Under Fire: Crypto Community Backs Deaton in 2024 Senate Election

    Story Highlights
    • Crypto leaders including Coinbase co-founder Brian Armstrong, are openly supporting Republican candidate John Deaton

    • Many in the crypto community believe Warren played a key role in appointing SEC Chair Gary Gensler.

    • Massachusetts has a strong Democratic voting history, and a victory for Deaton could signal a significant shift.

    The 2024 U.S. Senate election in Massachusetts is shaping up to be a fiercely contested battle, unlike previous races. Many crypto leaders have publicly rallied behind Republican candidate John Deaton in his challenge against Elizabeth Warren, who is aiming for her third consecutive term. Notably, Coinbase co-founder Brian Armstrong has urged Massachusetts voters to support Deaton.

    Why has the crypto community turned against Warren? And how might this impact her chances of re-election? Let’s explore the details!

    Why Is Warren Facing Backlash?

    Several prominent figures in the cryptocurrency sector believe Warren played a crucial role in appointing Gary Gensler as chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Under Gensler’s leadership, the SEC has initiated strict legal actions against major crypto companies.

    Armstrong has accused Warren of encouraging Gensler to adopt a hardline approach toward the crypto industry, suggesting she supports a government-controlled financial system.

    Armstrong is not alone in his criticism. A well-known crypto attorney, who goes by MetaLawMan on X, recently urged Massachusetts voters to back Deaton while strongly denouncing Warren’s stance against the cryptocurrency sector.

    According to a recent media report, many crypto enthusiasts view Warren as one of the key figures behind Operation Choke Point 2.0, a regulatory effort aimed at limiting digital asset firms’ access to the banking system.

    Warren’s Defensive Stance

    Warren has yet to respond to these latest allegations. Last month, she sharply criticized crypto fund groups, claiming that crypto leaders resist fair regulations for the industry. She has framed her tough regulatory stance as a way to protect the interests of working-class Americans.

    In contrast, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has recently softened her previous position on crypto regulation, expressing a willingness to replace Gensler with an SEC chair who is more open to the cryptocurrency finance sector.

    A Stronghold of Democratic Power

    Massachusetts has a strong history of supporting Democratic candidates. John F. Kennedy was elected to the U.S. Senate from this state in 1952, and since then, only once have Republicans defeated Democrats in this constituency—Scott Brown’s victory in 2010. However, Brown lost to Warren in 2012, and since then, she has remained undefeated, securing re-election in 2018.

    A victory in this election would mark her third consecutive win, a rare feat matched only by Ted Kennedy, who represented the constituency for nearly four decades.

    If the support from crypto leaders helps Republicans win in traditionally Democratic Massachusetts, the impact on the U.S. political landscape could be significant. This election may determine not only Warren’s political future but also the influence of the cryptocurrency sector in shaping public policy.

    Is Warren’s regulatory stance justified, or is it time for a change in Massachusetts? We want to hear your perspective!

    Show More

    Related Articles

    Back to top button