Thousands of XRP holders submitted statements and challenged the SEC's expert witness.
Writ of Mandamus forces SEC to reconsider crypto classification.
Naomi Brockwell's intervention in the LBRY case highlighted the power of individual investors.
In what can be described as a landmark case in the cryptocurrency industry, the ongoing battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken an interesting turn, thanks to the XRP community’s grit and Naomi Brockwell’s commendable efforts.
This move has breathed new life into the case and brought some much-needed energy in the developments. We’re excited, and you might be too. Dive into the details here!
XRP Army Takes a Stand
Renowned cryptocurrency influencer @novogratz recently highlighted the undeniable presence of the “#XRPArmy.” This fervent community demonstrated its strength and unity by contributing significantly to Ripple’s legal defense against the SEC.
In an extraordinary show of unity, thousands of XRP holders submitted statements, expressing their beliefs and investment reasons. Judge Torres’s recognition of these statements underscored the strong influence of the XRP community in the legal battle.
Also Read: SEC-Ripple Lawsuit Was Much Bigger Than Just XRP, Argues John Deaton
The Writ of Mandamus: Changing the Game
The case took a significant turn with the Writ of Mandamus, making the SEC acknowledge that the court, not the SEC, decides if something is a security. This paved the way for reconsidering the SEC’s approach to classifying cryptocurrencies.
Judge Torres critically examined and ultimately dismissed the SEC’s “embodiment theory,” a concept popularized by @NYcryptolawyer. This setback for the SEC showed a better understanding of cryptocurrency regulations within the legal system.
In an unusual move, thousands of investors aimed to become defendants, asserting their rights. This showcased the unique involvement of the XRP community in the legal process, an unprecedented move in securities litigation.
This Might Interest You: Top Analyst Hassan Tyler Critiques SEC Chair for Ignoring Lessons from Ripple’s Victory
Naomi Brockwell’s Story
XRP holders, acting as friends of the court, played a crucial role in challenging the SEC’s expert witness. Using a Twitter thread and affidavits, the Ripple legal team discredited the expert, leading to his exclusion by Judge Torres—a significant win for Ripple and XRP holders.
Adding complexity to the story, Naomi Brockwell’s role in the @LBRYcom case can’t be overlooked. Representing LBC holders, Brockwell sought clarification on how the court’s decision applies to secondary market transactions. Acknowledged by Judge Torres, Brockwell’s intervention emphasized the impact of individual voices in shaping legal outcomes in the crypto space.
In this captivating legal battle, the XRP community’s determination not only protected their interests but also challenged norms, setting a precedent for the future of crypto litigation.