News
  • Qadir AK
    author-profile

    Qadir AK right arrow

    Author

    Qadir Ak is the founder of Coinpedia. He has over a decade of experience writing about technology and has been covering the blockchain and cryptocurrency space since 2010. He has also interviewed a few prominent experts within the cryptocurrency space.

    • author facebook
    • author twitter
    • linkedin

  • 2 minutes read

What the Ripple v. SEC Lawsuit Conclusion Could Mean for Crypto

Story Highlights
  • Ripple’s $125M penalty reduction request denied by Judge Torres, stalling a proposed SEC settlement.

  • A final Ripple win could set a legal precedent, allowing banks and institutions to adopt blockchain for core financial functions.

The ongoing legal battle between Ripple Labs and the U.S. SEC has reached a critical juncture. On May 8, 2025, Judge Analisa Torres denied a joint motion from both parties seeking an indicative ruling to reduce Ripple’s $125 million penalty to $50 million and to release associated escrow funds. The court deemed the motion ā€œprocedurally improper,ā€ effectively stalling the proposed settlement.Ā 

Despite this setback, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, emphasized that the company’s previous legal victories remain intact, notably the 2023 ruling that XRP is not a security when sold on public exchanges.

A Blueprint for Blockchain in Banking

The X post by Crypto analyst SMQKE cites a William & Mary Law Review article (Vol. 66:1531) suggesting XRP holders own a ā€œslice of Ripple’s future cashflowsā€ from its transaction settlement system, implying XRP could be seen as a security tied to Ripple’s profits, which contradicts the 2023 SEC v. Ripple ruling that XRP is not a security when sold to the public on exchanges.

According to the analyst, a Ripple win would be a milestone for blockchain-based infrastructure. It could give banks, investment funds, and corporations a working model for how to shift critical financial functions, like payments, settlements, and custody, to blockchain networks. If XRP is officially deemed not a security, it would validate the idea that tokens can represent future corporate value without falling under strict securities laws.

This could pave the way for other companies to raise capital and transfer value on-chain, avoiding the regulatory roadblocks that often slow innovation.

Crypto Implications

SMQKE highlights that the foundations of finance are already beginning to shift. Tokenized shares could settle instantly, custody could be handled by smart contracts, and payment systems could directly connect to crypto wallets. Institutions would still play a role, but they’d operate on more efficient, digital rails.

If the court backs Ripple’s structure, it would send a strong message: blockchain technology is ready to support core financial operations. This wouldn’t just help Ripple, it would signal that the industry is mature enough to support the next phase of global finance.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

FAQs

What is the lawsuit between Ripple and the SEC about?

The SEC sued Ripple for selling XRP as unregistered securities, which Ripple denies, claiming XRP is not a security.

Who will win the SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit?

Ripple has scored partial wins, but a final ruling is pending; experts say the outcome could reshape crypto regulation in the U.S.

Could Ripple’s win impact blockchain adoption in banking?

Yes, a Ripple win could legitimize blockchain use for payments and custody, setting a legal model for financial institutions.

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button