VanEck’s CEO has put new pressure on Bitcoin’s long-term security, saying the firm would reconsider its position if quantum risks weaken BTC’s core thesis. His comments instantly reignited discussions around Bitcoin’s encryption, transparency, and the growing interest in privacy-focused alternatives.
In a CNBC interview, Jan van Eck said the Bitcoin community is now focused on two urgent questions: whether Bitcoin’s encryption can stand up to future quantum computers, and whether the network offers enough privacy for users who don’t want their activity exposed.
“We will walk away from Bitcoin if we think the thesis is fundamentally broken,” he said.
He noted that this debate is no longer niche – longtime Bitcoin holders are openly questioning whether the technology is prepared for the next era of computing.
Van Eck also pointed out that Bitcoin’s transparency is becoming a real concern. Anyone can watch a transaction move from one wallet to another, and that visibility is pushing users to rethink how much information they’re comfortable revealing on-chain.
These concerns are sending more “Bitcoin OGs” toward Zcash, a privacy-focused token built with zero-knowledge proofs. Van Eck said many early adopters are studying Zcash’s model as they look for stronger protections than Bitcoin’s transparent design can offer.
Community chatter reflects this shift, with rising interest in shielded transactions and more advanced privacy tools.
Another part of the discussion centers on quantum risk. Some voices in the community are calling 2026 a realistic target year for quantum-resistant upgrades.
Vitalik Buterin added his own warning recently, saying there’s a notable chance quantum-capable machines could arrive before 2030. Because blockchain upgrades take years, he urged developers to prepare well before the threat becomes real.
If Bitcoin doesn’t move toward post-quantum protection, institutions, regulators, and ETF issuers may eventually push for answers. Privacy concerns may also steer more users toward Zcash or other zero-knowledge networks.
Attention now turns to Bitcoin’s developers as the community waits to see whether 2026 becomes a real deadline or another warning left unanswered.
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
The crypto market is shifting toward real utility projects, and investors are searching for the…
November 2025 brings fresh momentum to early-stage projects. Speculative tokens are feeling pressure from weaker…
Let’s get real: the idea of XRP zooming to $10 feels nice, but it’s far…
WLFI is showing impressive strength, reclaiming its entire breakdown zone while most of the market…
Bybit’s 28th Proof of Reserves snapshot (Nov. 19) reveals strong growth in user BTC and…
Aerodrome Finance, a leading decentralised exchange on the Base blockchain, recently warned about a possible…
