News
  • Nidhi Kolhapur
    author-profile

    Nidhi Kolhapur right arrow

    Author

    Nidhi is a Certified Digital Marketing Executive and Passionate crypto Journalist covering the world of alternative currencies. She shares the latest and trending news on Cryptocurrency and Blockchain.

    • author facebook
    • author twitter
    • linkedin

  • 2 minutes read

Binance vs SEC: Court Grants Extra Time for Response

Story Highlights
  • The US court has allowed the SEC to submit a 70-page omnibus response to the motions to dismiss filed by Binance and Changpeng Zhao.

  • The SEC requested the extension to address the complex legal arguments raised by the defendants.

  • The SEC's consolidated response to the motions to dismiss is due on December 4th.

In a recent development, a US court has granted the SECโ€™s request to submit a combined response to the Motions to Dismiss, allowing up to 70 pages. This motion comes after Binance, its CEO Changpeng Zhao, and Binance US asked the court to dismiss the amended complaint filed against them.

However, the court has not yet decided whether to dismiss the case.

Judge Approves SEC’s Request

Previously, the US SEC had requested permission to exceed the typical page limit under local rules, noting the complexity of the motions involving multiple legal arguments. In response, Judge Amy Jackson approved the request, allowing the SEC to submit a combined response that will be at most 70 pages.

The extension now grants the SEC extra space to address the legal points raised by both the defendants in the ongoing Binance lawsuit

Binance and CZ Fight Back

Binanceโ€™s legal team, along with CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, filed a motion to dismiss the SECโ€™s amended complaint last month. They argued that the complaint โ€œpays lip serviceโ€ to a previous court ruling that said crypto assets themselves are not securities. However, they claim the SEC โ€œrefuses to accept the logical conclusionโ€ of this rulingโ€”that secondary market resales of assets, after theyโ€™ve been initially distributed by developers, are not โ€œsecuritiesโ€ transactions.

โ€œInstead, the SECโ€™s Amended Complaint continues to insist that virtually all transactions involving crypto assetsโ€”including blind secondary market resales of tokensโ€”are securities transactions because some buyers might hope the assets will increase in value,โ€ it said.

SEC Criticized for Lack of Clear Guidelines

Binanceโ€™s lawyers also slammed the SEC for its lack of clarity on crypto-asset regulation. The filing stated that the SEC has not provided clear rules to help courts, litigants, or market participants understand which crypto transactions count as investment contracts and which do not.

The SEC has said it will consolidate all responses into a single document to save time and avoid repeating arguments. With the courtโ€™s approval, the SEC now has the go-ahead to submit this combined response, which is due by December 4.

FAQs

What is the latest update in the Binance vs SEC case?

The SEC was granted permission to submit a 70-page response to Binance’s dismissal motion, with the court’s decision still pending.

What is the SEC’s stance on crypto asset transactions in the Binance case?

The SEC argues most crypto asset transactions, including secondary market resales, qualify as securities transactions based on potential value increases.

With both sides gearing up for a prolonged legal fight, the next few weeks will be critical. Stay tuned for all the updates!

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button