Advertise
- Rizwan AnsariRizwan Ansari
- Reviewed by:
Sohrab KhawasSohrab is a passionate cryptocurrency news writer with over five years of experience covering the industry. He keeps a keen interest in blockchain technology and its potential to revolutionize finance. Whether he's trading or writing, Sohrab always keeps his finger on the pulse of the crypto world, using his expertise to deliver informative and engaging articles that educate and inspire. When he's not analyzing the markets, Sohrab indulges in his hobbies of graphic design, minimal design or listening to his favorite hip-hop tunes.
- Dec 10, 2025 10:48 UTC
-
U.S. Lawmaker Pushes CBDC Ban Into NDAA After ‘Broken Promises’ Claim
U.S. lawmaker Keith Self files NDAA amendment to block CBDC after broken promises claims
House Rules Committee decision will determine whether CBDC ban amendment reaches full vote lawmakers
Trump executive order banning CBDCs increases pressure for Congress to pass permanent legal ban
A new debate has begun in Washington today after U.S. lawmaker Keith Self revealed that he has formally submitted an amendment to add a ban on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
He now says those promises were not kept, which is why he is taking matters into his own hands. His amendment, he explains, is meant to “fix the bill.”
Rep. Keith Introduces CBDC Ban Amendment Before NDAA Vote
On 9th Dec, Rep. Keith Self revealed that he has formally submitted an amendment titled “Anti-CBDC Surveillance State” to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that goes beyond just banning a digital dollar.
Self said, It aims to stop the Federal Reserve from creating, testing, or supporting any digital asset that works like a CBDC, even under a different name. However, the proposal also blocks Federal Reserve banks from offering accounts or financial services directly to individuals
Meanwhile, the amendment was filed just as the House Rules Committee prepared to decide whether the bill would move to a full vote.
Self said the move was needed because lawmakers were promised a CBDC ban in the NDAA, but it was later removed.
Why Republicans Are Pushing Back on CBDCs
The CBDC issue has caused frustration among several Republican lawmakers. They believe a government-backed digital currency could allow authorities to track spending, limit purchases, or control how people use their money.
Therefore, lawmakers have made it clear that while they support crypto and blockchain innovation, they do not support any system where the government can control how Americans use their money.
For him, this issue is not just about technology; it’s about basic freedom. And, he argues that a major bill like the NDAA must protect citizens from this kind of financial control.
House Rules Committee to Decide the Next Step
The most important moment is coming later today. The House Rules Committee will meet and decide whether Rep. Self’s amendment should move forward for a full vote on the House floor.
This decision will determine whether Congress gets the chance to officially debate, and possibly ban, a U.S. CBDC.
Rep. Self made it clear that he hopes the committee “does the right thing,” especially after what he says were broken commitments earlier in the process.
Trump’s Executive Order Adds Pressure
Earlier this year, President Donald Trump signed an executive order banning federal agencies from promoting or creating CBDCs. The order cited risks to privacy, financial stability, and national control.
Lawmakers now argue that an executive order is not enough and that a permanent legal ban is needed.
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!
Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.
FAQs
He filed an “Anti‑CBDC Surveillance State” amendment to the NDAA to prohibit Federal Reserve banks from issuing, testing, or supporting any central bank digital currency — even under a different name.
They argue a CBDC could give the government excessive control — enabling surveillance, spending restrictions, or account freezes — which threatens financial privacy and freedom.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Yes 
No 
