Trump officials plan to inspect the Fed’s $2.5B renovation project over suspected mismanagement.
The move follows Trump’s renewed attacks on Fed Chair Jerome Powell, citing possible fraud.
Powell defends the renovation as necessary for safety upgrades and structural repairs.
President Donald Trump’s administration is set to visit the Federal Reserve’s Washington headquarters this week to review its $2.5 billion renovation project. The visit was first reported by Semafor and confirmed by White House Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair.
This move follows rising tensions between the White House and Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Trump has accused Powell of possible fraud related to the costly project, though no evidence has been presented. Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott is also reportedly in talks to join the visit, signaling increased scrutiny of the central bank.
Is This About Fraud or Pressure?
Trump has long been unhappy with Powell over the Fed’s reluctance to cut interest rates. Now, the renovation project has become a new point of conflict.
According to Blair, Powell told the administration that the renovation’s design plans had changed since the original proposal.
“We just want to know whether or not that’s true,” Blair said.
Trump Sharpens His Attack on Powell
The situation has become personal. Trump, who appointed Powell in 2018, recently called him “The Worst Federal Reserve Chairman in History” on Truth Social.
He’s now using the renovation issue to support his push to remove Powell, again suggesting mismanagement or fraud without offering proof.
Powell Defends the $2.5 Billion Project
Fed Chair Powell has responded to the criticism by explaining why the renovation is necessary. In a letter to the Office of Management and Budget, he said the two buildings, which date back to the 1930s, need significant upgrades. These include removing asbestos, repairing structural damage, and modernizing plumbing, fire detection systems, and other infrastructure.
Powell also said the project reflects the Fed’s commitment to responsible use of public funds and ensuring a safe and functional workplace.
Is This Oversight or a Power Play?
The visit from Trump’s team may be about more than just reviewing a construction budget. It raises broader questions about political pressure and the future of the Federal Reserve’s independence.
With Powell continuing to defend the project and his leadership, the conflict is likely to keep growing. Whether the visit uncovers real issues or becomes a political statement, it could have long-term effects on the Fed and U.S. monetary policy.
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!
Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.
FAQs
The Trump administration is visiting the Federal Reserve headquarters to review its $2.5 billion renovation project, following President Trump’s accusations of possible fraud and mismanagement against Fed Chair Jerome Powell.
Yes, the visit raises concerns about political pressure on the Federal Reserve’s leadership and autonomy.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.