Is the SEC Killing Crypto Progress? Industry Demands Regulatory Reform

The American crypto economy is in a heated debate over regulations led by SEC Chair Gary Gensler and other powerful figures. But this regulatory pushback faces strong opposition from voices like Steven Neyaroff and Mark Cuban, who say the rules do more harm than good.

And they backed their opinions with strong reasons. Here’s what they have to say.

Industry Titans Clash: Neyaroff Speaks Out

Senior Bloomberg analyst Steven Neyaroff is leading the charge against regulatory actions by ConsenSys CEO Joseph Lubin and SEC Chair Gary Gensler. Neyaroff accuses Lubin of deliberately holding back the crypto market’s growth for personal gain, causing significant losses for the public.

“Lubin along with other bad actors have artificially kept the overall market cap of crypto low, preventing the growth of the ecosystem and fleecing the public of hundreds of billions to trillions.” 

Steven Neyaroff

Neyaroff argues, suggesting that Lubin, Gensler, and other bad actors’ actions have not only stifled the growth of the industry but also deprived the public of significant economic benefits. The market capital could be booming with higher profits with the help of the decentralised and blockchain industry if it had not been for these inhibitive strategies.

As a seasoned market analysis, Neyaroff also points to a larger pattern of regulatory mismanagement.

“It is clear that Lubin fears his own downfall, and the truth is at the gates – from securities fraud to market manipulation, colluding with foreign governments and US government agencies, he has done it all.”

Rumours say Neyaroff has asked Lubin for a public debate. However, Neyaroff claims, “He wouldn’t speak to me, even if we were the last two people on earth. I believe he’s both embarrassed and frustrated that he couldn’t use the government’s power to bring me down.”

Billionaire Mark Cuban Calls for Reform

Mark Cuban has expressed his viewpoint echoing with a similar critique as Neyaroff. Cuban, in several of his X posts, has pinpointed several flaws in Gensler’s SEC’s regulatory framework, especially its prohibitive and time-consuming registration process.

According to him, the SEC’s current approach is not only ineffective but also detrimental.

“The process to register can take a securities lawyer hundreds or more hours to be completed for a simple token release.”

The criticism is directed towards the SEC’s aggressive regulatory strategy, which both Neyaroff and Cuban have argued that it has failed to protect a single investor. The difference between between high-quality projects and less scrupulous ventures leads to a confused market environment.

This indiscriminate regulatory approach has prompted calls for legislative reform and possibly shifting some oversight responsibilities to the CFTC, which is perceived as having a better grasp of the market dynamics at play.

The Road Ahead

With Neyaroff and Cuban leading the charge, the debate over crypto regulation in the U.S. is heating up. Their insights highlight the need for a regulatory framework that encourages innovation while safeguarding investors.

As calls for reform grow louder, finding the right balance between oversight and innovation becomes increasingly crucial.

Also Check Out: Cryptocurrency Could Sway US Elections: Industry Leaders Cuban & Hoskinson Speak Out