
South Korea delays the Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 amid stablecoin regulation disputes.
Regulators disagree on stablecoin oversight, reserve control, and enforcement authority.
Unclear rules may slow crypto innovation and affect investor confidence in Korea.
South Korea’s long-awaited Digital Asset Basic Law has hit another roadblock. Authorities have officially delayed the submission of the bill until 2026, signaling deeper disagreements behind the scenes over how stablecoins should be regulated in one of Asia’s most active crypto markets.
The delay reflects unresolved tensions between financial regulators and central banking authorities, at a time when digital assets are becoming increasingly embedded in South Korea’s financial system.
What the Digital Asset Basic Law Was Meant to Do
The proposed law is designed to create a clear legal framework for digital assets, with a strong focus on investor protection. One of its central features is the introduction of no-fault liability for digital asset operators, meaning companies could be held responsible for losses even without proven negligence.
Another major objective is to reduce systemic risk tied to stablecoins. The draft law requires stablecoin issuers to fully back their tokens with reserve assets, held at banks or approved institutions, with reserves exceeding 100% of the circulating supply. This structure aims to isolate bankruptcy risk and prevent spillover effects in the event of issuer failure.
Why Stablecoins Are at the Center of the Dispute
The delay stems largely from disagreements between the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and financial institutions, including the Bank of Korea. While regulators broadly agree on the need for oversight, there is no consensus on who should ultimately control reserve requirements, supervision, and enforcement for stablecoin issuers.
These differences have made it difficult to finalize the bill’s structure, pushing authorities to postpone submission rather than move forward with unresolved gaps.
Impact on the Crypto Market and Investor Confidence
While no immediate market reaction has been recorded, the delay introduces uncertainty for crypto firms operating in South Korea. Stablecoin issuers, exchanges, and payment providers are left navigating unclear rules as adoption continues to grow.
Industry observers note that regulatory hesitation, even when driven by caution, can slow innovation and weaken investor confidence. Without clear guidelines, firms may delay expansion plans or seek friendlier jurisdictions.
Politics and Monetary Goals Add Pressure
As talks drag on, the ruling Democratic Party is working on its own version of a digital asset bill by combining ideas from multiple lawmakers. Meanwhile, political urgency is building.
President Lee Jae Myung has made the development of a Korean won-backed stablecoin a priority, viewing it as a way to safeguard monetary sovereignty in a global market dominated by U.S. dollar stablecoins.
The delayed Digital Asset Basic Act represents the second phase of South Korea’s broader crypto framework. The first phase, already in effect, focused on cracking down on unfair trading practices. What comes next will shape how stablecoins and digital assets fit into Korea’s financial future.
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!
Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.
FAQs
It’s a proposed law to regulate crypto assets, protect investors, and set rules for exchanges and stablecoins within South Korea’s financial system.
Yes. Unclear rules can create uncertainty for investors and firms, potentially slowing innovation and market confidence in the short term.
A 20% capital gains tax on crypto profits has been delayed to 2027 in South Korea; currently, there’s no crypto tax.
No, Binance is not available in South Korea. Foreign exchanges must register and comply with local financial laws, which Binance has not done.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.




