News
  • Debashree Patra
    author-profile

    Debashree Patra right arrow

    Author

    Fun-loving and cheerful, a passionate blockchain and crypto writer who knows no boundaryโ€ฆconnect if you share the same passion. With 10+ years of writing experience, I am a Crypto Journalist by chance, exploring, and learning all the dynamics of the sci-fi action-filled crypto world. Currently, focusing on cryptocurrency news and price data. With a passion for research and challenging my capabilities, I am slowly getting into the crypto arena to bring new insights every day.

    • 2 minutes read

    Ripple vs SEC: Decrypting SEC’s Damage Theory in XRP lawsuit, A Fortunate Turn for Ripple?

    In a recent video update shared by crypto expert James Murphy and Wolf of Wall Street Scott Melker delves into the intricacies of the SECโ€™s damages theory in the Ripple case, highlighting what he sees as a fortunate turn of events for Ripple.

    Decrypting SECโ€™s Damage Theory? 

    As a result of a decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, he brings up an important issue about a law precedent that says the SEC must show wrongdoing by identifying victims who have lost real money.

    Melker sheds light on the SECโ€™s losses theory and points out a big problem: no XRP buyers can be identified as having lost money. Instead, the SECโ€™s case is based on the idea that some buyers bought XRP at lower prices, which is a claim that goes beyond the meaning of โ€œpecuniary harmโ€ without showing specific companies lost money.

    By failing to identify clear victims who have suffered real financial losses, the SECโ€™s case weakens considerably. The principle of disgorgement, which aims to return illicit profits to those harmed, loses its footing without identifiable victims. This raises questions about the legitimacy of the $200 million interest claimed by the SEC, as it relies on the existence of discouraged buyers who have suffered financial harm.

    SECโ€™s Penalty Is Question

    Interestingly, Melkerโ€™s research makes it sound like Ripple may have had a lucky break in this court case. Since there is no proof of real harm, it would be hard for the court to show why the proposed $850 million penalty is fair. In securities lawsuits, this shows how important it is to show real financial harm. It also suggests that Ripple may have a better case than was thought before.

    Do You Know? : Terraform Labs Faces SEC in High-Stakes Trial: Judge Issues Jury Instructions

    Future Implications

    Looking ahead, the SEC has demanded a whopping $2B which is unfair for many. While Ripple fights back, slamming the charges as an intimidation tactic and overreach. if the court sides with the SEC and imposes the $2 billion fine on Ripple, the company may need to sell around 3.22 billion XRP coins at the current market price of $0.62 per coin to raise the required funds.

    However, Ripple could potentially tap into its reported $1 billion cash reserves to cover the penalty, as disclosed by CEO Brad Garlinghouse earlier this year, mitigating the immediate impact on XRPโ€™s market dynamics.

    Also Check Out The: Will Coinbase Have the Same Fate As Ripple? Hereโ€™s What To Expect Next in Coinbase vs SEC Lawsuit

    Show More

    Related Articles

    Back to top button