News
  • ๏ปฟAnjali Belgaumkar
    author-profile
    ๏ปฟAnjali Belgaumkar right arrow
    Author

    Writer by choice, CryptoCurrency Writer, and Researcher by chance. Currently, focusing on financial news and analysis, as well as cryptocurrency news and data. One may not call me a crypto โ€œEnthusiastโ€ but trust me I'm getting there.

    • author twitter
    • linkedin
  • Reviewed by: Qadir AK
    author profile
    Qadir AK right arrow
    Reviewed

    Qadir Ak is the founder of Coinpedia. He has over a decade of experience writing about technology and has been covering the blockchain and cryptocurrency space since 2010. He has also interviewed a few prominent experts within the cryptocurrency space.

    • author facebook
    • author twitter
    • author linkedin
  • 2 minutes read

Ripple CTO Explains Why 35,000 XRP Was Once Considered Worthless

Story Highlights
  • David Schwartz says no XRP was destroyed; early ledger resets only removed some historical transaction records.

  • Rippleโ€™s current holdings remain transparent and verifiable on the public blockchain.

Rippleโ€™s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, has addressed one of the longest-running myths about XRP, the claim that hundreds of transactions from the early days wiped out part of the cryptocurrencyโ€™s supply due to a bug.

The โ€œLost XRPโ€ Story

According to critics, 534 transactions involving XRPโ€™s original supply, known as the premine of 100 billion coins in 2012, were supposedly lost because of a technical glitch. This led to questions about whether the amount of XRP held by Ripple today can be independently verified.

In an interview with Decrypt, Schwartz explained that Rippleโ€™s accounts are well known and traceable on the blockchain. While ownership details of every historical account are not always public, the source of funds can still be tracked. He said that at the time of the supposed โ€œloss,โ€ Ripple still held about 99.9% of all XRP, meaning the number of coins involved was tiny.

XRP Was Worthless in the Early Days

One of Schwartzโ€™s important points was that XRP had no market value in 2012. โ€œIt had literally zero value,โ€ he said. โ€œWhen we would give XRP away, we would just pick a number at random, like 35,000 coins, and hand them out.โ€

The blockchainโ€™s ledger, a record of all transactions, was reset multiple times in the early development stages when protocol changes were made. This was common practice at the time, and when the ledger โ€œlossโ€ happened, the team had no way of knowing it would become the permanent record moving forward.

No Coins Actually Disappeared

Schwartz said that while the historical record of some early transactions was lost, the XRP itself was not destroyed or removed from circulation. Each ledger still contains the current balances of all accounts, and the origins of those balances can be traced to Rippleโ€™s founders if they came from the premine.

The only thing missing is the full transaction history from the earliest days and something that could have been erased entirely if another ledger reset had been performed later on.

Clearing the Air

For Schwartz, the key takeaway is that these early ledger resets were part of the normal development process, and the small number of coins in question had no value at the time. The myth of โ€œmissing XRPโ€ is more of a misunderstanding about blockchain history than evidence of foul play.

Rippleโ€™s current holdings remain transparent, and anyone can verify them using public blockchain data. As Schwartz put it, โ€œAll the balances are visible, and itโ€™s known whether they were funded from the founders of Ripple.โ€

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

FAQs

How does this clarification impact XRP’s circulating supply?

The confirmed 99.9% premine accuracy means XRP’s current 53.7B circulating supply is verifiably correct – important for institutional investors evaluating the asset.

How does XRP’s early development compare to Ethereum’s?

Like ETH’s testnet resets, XRP’s ledger changes were standard for 2012-era blockchains – unlike Bitcoin which kept its full history from genesis.

Does this affect XRP’s deflationary burn mechanism?

No – the 0.00001 XRP transaction burn (destroying 5.6M XRP annually) operates independently and wasn’t impacted by these early ledger events.

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button