News
  • Zafar Naik
    author-profile
    Zafar Naik right arrow
    Author

    Zafar is a seasoned crypto and blockchain news writer with four years of experience. Known for accuracy, in-depth analysis, and a clear, engaging style, Zafar actively participates in blockchain communities. Beyond writing, Zafar enjoys trading and exploring the latest trends in the crypto market.

    • 2 minutes read

    MakerDAO’s Black Thursday: How One Bot Got $8.32M in ETH for Free

    Story Highlights
    • On March 12, 2020, a single bot acquired $8.32M in ETH and paid absolutely nothing.

    • MakerDAO's liquidation system worked exactly as designed, which was the problem.

    • Every major DeFi protocol built after 2020 traces its risk design back to one 40-minute window.

    On March 12, 2020, one bot acquired $8.32 million worth of ETH and paid absolutely nothing for it. There was no hack and no exploit. Just a broken assumption inside one of DeFi’s most trusted protocols and a 40-minute window that nobody saw coming.

    Here’s the story.

    What MakerDAO’s System Was Built to Do

    MakerDAO lets users lock ETH as collateral to borrow DAI. When that collateral loses too much value, the vault gets liquidated through an on-chain auction. Bots called keepers bid DAI to purchase the collateral, the debt gets covered, and the protocol stays solvent.

    The entire mechanism relied on one assumption holding true: that competing bots would always show up.

    The 40 Minutes That Broke DeFi

    ETH dropped 43% in hours that day. Hundreds of vaults went underwater at the same time, and every keeper bot on the network tried to respond at once. Ethereum could not handle the traffic. Gas prices spiked 10x and most keeper bots ran on fixed gas settings, leaving their transactions stuck in the mempool and going nowhere.

    Auctions were opening and nobody was bidding.

    One bot noticed. It submitted a bid of 0 DAI, waited out the timer, and collected real ETH for free when no competing bids arrived. Then it did it again. For nearly 40 minutes, that one bot swept auction after auction at zero cost, walking away with $8.32 million in ETH before the network stabilized and other bots could get back in.

    Also Read: Did the Clarity Act Pass? Not Yet, But Banks Are Already Buying These 8 Altcoins

    MKR Holders Paid the Price

    MakerDAO was left with $4.5 million in bad debt, something the protocol had never faced before. MKR holders voted to mint new tokens and sell them into the open market just to cover the shortfall, diluting every existing holder in the process.

    The contract had done exactly what it was coded to do. The auction ran correctly. The bot followed the rules.

    As one observer summed it up in the thread that is now going viral on X: “The protocol didn’t break because the rules were wrong. It broke because the design assumed continuous market participation at the exact moment the market became least functional.”

    Why the Story Still Matters

    Analysts say every major DeFi liquidation system built after 2020 traces its risk design back to one 40-minute window. Black Thursday changed how the entire industry approaches risk when liquidity, bots, and block space fail all at once.

    With DeFi liquidations back in the headlines and billions under pressure with the ongoing US-Israel-Iran war, the lesson is hitting differently right now.

    Trust with CoinPedia:

    CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

    Investment Disclaimer:

    All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

    Sponsored and Advertisements:

    Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

    Show More

    Related Articles

    Back to top button