News
  • Zafar Naik
    author-profile
    Zafar Naik right arrow
    Author

    Zafar is a seasoned crypto and blockchain news writer with four years of experience. Known for accuracy, in-depth analysis, and a clear, engaging style, Zafar actively participates in blockchain communities. Beyond writing, Zafar enjoys trading and exploring the latest trends in the crypto market.

    • 2 minutes read

    Kalshi and Polymarket Face Senate Ban: End of Sports Betting on Prediction Markets?

    Story Highlights
    • A Republican and a Democrat just introduced a bill to ban sports betting on Kalshi and Polymarket.

    • Kalshi is already facing criminal charges, a Nevada court ban, and lawsuits across multiple states.

    • Sports contracts make up the majority of both platforms' trading volume - this bill goes after their core business.

    Prediction markets have spent months arguing they are not gambling. Congress is not convinced, and now both sides of the aisle are saying so in writing.

    On March 23, Senators Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California, and John Curtis, a Republican from Utah, introduced bipartisan legislation that would prohibit CFTC-regulated platforms from offering contracts tied to sporting events and casino-style games.

    The bill directly targets Kalshi and Polymarket’s US platform – the two dominant players in a market that has grown to nearly $20 billion in combined valuation.

    Why a Utah Republican Co-Sponsoring This Bill Matters

    Curtis’ involvement is the detail that changes the political calculus. Utah is one of the few states where gambling is banned under the state constitution. His co-sponsorship of a bill targeting the CFTC – a federal regulator under a Republican administration – signals that opposition to prediction market sports betting extends well beyond Democratic critics.

    Curtis made his reasoning plain: “Too many young people in Utah are getting exposed to addictive sports betting and casino-style gaming contracts that belong under state control, not under federal regulators.”

    Schiff framed the issue as a regulatory failure: “The CFTC is greenlighting these markets and even promoting their growth,” adding that Congress should “eliminate this backdoor which violates state consumer protections, intrudes upon tribal sovereignty and offers no public revenue.”

    A Market Under Pressure From Every Direction

    The proposed legislation does not arrive in isolation. Nevada recently secured a temporary restraining order blocking Kalshi from offering contracts tied to sports, elections, and entertainment.

    Arizona filed criminal charges against Kalshi’s parent companies, alleging it operates an unlicensed gambling business, which Kalshi has disputed. Massachusetts, Michigan, and other states have also pursued legal action, while Polymarket filed its own lawsuit against Michigan to prevent enforcement of state gambling laws.

    The Ninth Circuit recently denied Kalshi’s emergency request for a stay in a Nevada-related case, a development that could accelerate further state-level action.

    Despite the regulatory pressure, both platforms have continued to expand. Kalshi and Polymarket have explored fundraising at valuations of around $20 billion.

    Institutional firms, including Susquehanna International Group and Jump Trading, are active as market makers on Kalshi. Major League Baseball recently signed a licensing deal with Polymarket.

    The Core Dispute

    The CFTC has argued it holds exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts as part of the commodities-derivatives market. Today’s bipartisan Senate bill is a direct challenge to that position and one of the first times a Republican senator has formally joined that challenge.

    Whether Congress moves fast enough to matter is a separate question. The legal battles in state courts will not wait.

    Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

    Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

    FAQs

    Why are lawmakers targeting prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket?

    Lawmakers argue these platforms resemble gambling and bypass state laws, raising concerns about consumer protection and regulatory oversight.

    How could this bill impact prediction market platforms?

    If passed, platforms may be forced to remove sports-related contracts in the US, limiting growth and changing their business models.

    Are prediction markets considered gambling in the US?

    The classification is debated. Some regulators see them as financial contracts, while others view them as gambling subject to state laws.

    Trust with CoinPedia:

    CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

    Investment Disclaimer:

    All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

    Sponsored and Advertisements:

    Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

    Show More

    Related Articles

    Back to top button