News
  • Nidhi Kolhapur
    author-profile
    Nidhi Kolhapur right arrow
    Author

    Nidhi is a Certified Digital Marketing Executive and Passionate crypto Journalist covering the world of alternative currencies. She shares the latest and trending news on Cryptocurrency and Blockchain.

    • author facebook
    • author twitter
    • linkedin
  • 2 minutes read

France Targets EU-Licensed Crypto Firms, Malta Opposes Centralized Oversight

Story Highlights
  • France threatens to block crypto firms licensed in other EU countries from operating domestically.

  • France, Italy, and Austria urge direct EU oversight

  • Malta opposes centralizing control, warns of extra bureaucracy and inefficiency.

France is considering blocking some crypto firms licensed in other EU countries from operating domestically. This move comes as several countries debate whether the bloc’s central securities regulator should take a greater role in overseeing crypto companies.

MiCA, the EU’s recently implemented digital asset regulation, allows crypto firms to secure a licence in one member state and operate across all 27 EU countries. However, it has exposed inconsistencies, including rushed license approvals and cross-border firms not closely monitored.

According to a report from Reuters, the country’s financial watchdog, the AMF, is worried that under the new EU rules, crypto companies are choosing countries with lenient licensing standards.

France Pushes for Stronger EU Crypto Oversight

France has now joined Italy and Austria in urging the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to directly oversee major crypto firms. 

The AMF warned that it might challenge the EU’s “passporting” system, which lets a company licensed in one country operate across the entire EU.

“We do not exclude the possibility of refusing the EU passport. It’s very complex legally and not a very good signal for the single market – it’s a bit like the ‘atomic weapon’ but it’s still a possibility we hold in reserve,” AMF President, Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani said.

Push for ESMA Control

The three watchdogs said that in the first few months of the new rules, national authorities have been supervising crypto markets very differently. They argue that direct EU supervision would better protect investors and are also pushing for stricter rules for crypto activity outside the EU, stronger cybersecurity, and closer oversight of new token offerings.

Earlier this year, Malta faced scrutiny after an ESMA review found it had not fully assessed risks when licensing a crypto firm. However, it defended its role as an “early adopter” of digital asset rules.

Malta Opposes Centralized EU Oversight

In a latest update, Malta’s financial watchdog pushed back against giving ESMA more centralized authority over crypto firms.

Malta’s financial regulator, the MFSA, said that it supports ESMA’s efforts to align how EU countries supervise crypto firms, but it does not agree with fully centralizing control. It warned that centralization at this stage could increase bureaucracy and reduce efficiency, at a time when the EU is trying to boost its competitiveness.

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button