Advertise
- Rizwan AnsariRizwan Ansari
- Reviewed by:
Sohrab KhawasSohrab is a passionate cryptocurrency news writer with over five years of experience covering the industry. He keeps a keen interest in blockchain technology and its potential to revolutionize finance. Whether he's trading or writing, Sohrab always keeps his finger on the pulse of the crypto world, using his expertise to deliver informative and engaging articles that educate and inspire. When he's not analyzing the markets, Sohrab indulges in his hobbies of graphic design, minimal design or listening to his favorite hip-hop tunes.
- Nov 01, 2025 11:37 UTC
-
Custodia Bank Loses Appeal as Court Upholds Fed’s Crypto Account Rejection
U.S. court backs the Federal Reserve’s decision to deny Custodia Bank a master account, dealing a major blow to crypto banks seeking central system access.
Despite the setback, talk of “skinny master accounts” hints the Fed may soon offer tightly regulated access to crypto and fintech firms under strict limits.
The fight between Custodia Bank and the Federal Reserve just took another sharp turn, and it’s not in favor of crypto. A U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has sided with the Fed’s decision to deny Custodia Bank a master account, a move that effectively keeps crypto-focused banks locked out of the nation’s central banking system for now.
Why the U.S. Court Denies Custodia Bank a Master Account
Custodia applied for a Fed master account in 2020 to bridge crypto and traditional banking. After a 19-month wait, the Fed rejected the request in January 2023, citing weak risk management in its crypto-focused model.
Custodia sued, arguing the Fed had no right to deny eligible applicants. However, the appeals court recently ruled in favor of the Fed, upholding its authority to protect financial stability.
In its recent decision, the appeals court sided with the Fed.
- The court clarified that eligibility for a master account does not guarantee a right to access.
- Judge David Ebel stated the Fed’s discretion is essential to “protect the nation’s financial system.”
- The court found that the Federal Reserve used its supervisory power lawfully and that Custodia’s arguments did not override the Fed’s statutory authority.
Judge’s Dissent Keeps Hope Alive
Judge Timothy Tymkovich disagreed with the decision, saying the Fed’s rules require it to give access to all eligible banks. Custodia called the ruling “disappointing” but said it might appeal, as similar cases could set different precedents.
For now, the decision keeps crypto-focused banks locked out of the Fed’s payment system, a setback for those trying to bridge crypto with traditional finance.
Fed Considers Limited Access for Crypto Firms
Still, change could be coming. Fed Governor Christopher Waller has proposed introducing “skinny master accounts” for fintech and stablecoin firms. These accounts would allow limited, highly regulated access to the Fed’s payment systems, with strict conditions like no overdrafts, no interest, and capped balances.
If implemented, it could represent the Fed’s cautious first move toward engaging with the crypto sector, offering access, but under tight control.
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!
Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.
FAQs
The court ruled the Fed has discretion to deny access, citing weak risk controls in Custodia’s crypto model and its duty to protect financial stability.
The decision keeps crypto-focused banks out of the Fed’s system for now, limiting their ability to directly settle payments or hold reserves.
No. The court clarified that eligibility doesn’t guarantee access — the Fed can deny accounts to safeguard the financial system.
Yes. Custodia plans to consider an appeal, and future cases could shape how courts balance innovation with regulatory oversight.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Yes 
No 
