News
  • Rizwan Ansari
    author-profile
    Rizwan Ansari right arrow
    Author

    Rizwan is an experienced Crypto journalist with almost half a decade of experience covering everything related to the growing crypto industry — from price analysis to blockchain disruption. During this period, he’s authored more than 3,000 news articles for Coinpedia News.

    • 1 minute read

    Crypto OG Loses $24M In Suspected Address Poisoning Attack – PeckShield

    Story Highlights
    • Crypto OG sillytuna lost nearly $24M after suspected address poisoning attack drained aEthUSDC holdings.

    • Hacker converted $20M into DAI, splitting stolen funds across two intermediary wallets still traceable on-chain.

    • Sillytuna claims incident involved violence, weapons, and kidnapping threats, prompting police investigation and crypto exit.

    A major security breach has shocked the crypto community after a wallet linked to an early crypto participant and NFT collector, sillytuna, lost roughly $24 million worth of aETHUSDC in what analysts believe to be an address poisoning attack.

    But, sillytuna says that the theft process actually involved violence, weapons, kidnapping, and rape threats.

    Lets Find it out!

    How Sillytuna Loses $24M In Address Poisoning Attack

    Blockchain security firm PeckShield first flagged suspicious activity after noticing a large token transfer from a wallet beginning with 0xd2e8…ca41, reportedly associated with a long-time crypto figure. 

    On-chain records show the wallet sent 23,596,293 aEthUSDC (worth roughly $23.5 million) in a single transfer to another wallet (0x6fef…a246032). PeckShield believes the attacker used an address-poisoning technique 

    Further, the attacker quickly converted $20 million of the stolen assets into DAI and distributed the funds across two intermediary wallets.

    Attacker Started Bridging Fund Towards Arbitrum

    Blockchain monitoring also shows the attacker has started bridging small portions of the funds to the Arbitrum network.

    One tracked transfer indicates a bridge transaction sending roughly 49.85 ETH, which resulted in over 106,000 USDC appearing on Arbitrum through a cross-chain bridge.

    Security researchers believe the attacker may continue moving funds in smaller portions to avoid triggering alerts.

    Victim Claims Physical Threats Were Involved

    Shortly after the attack became public, sillytuna confirmed the compromised wallet was his personal address, revealing that the situation involved serious real-world threats.

    According to his statement, the incident included violence, weapons, and kidnapping threats, adding that law enforcement authorities are now handling the investigation.

    Shaken by the incident, the veteran crypto participant said he plans to leave the crypto industry completely. 

    Despite the loss, sillytuna said he was thankful the situation did not turn worse and that he managed to escape without serious physical harm.

    Bounty Offered to Recover Stolen Funds

    Following the incident, the NFT collector publicly offered a 10% bounty for anyone able to help recover the stolen funds. The offer applies to individuals, investigators, or even parties involved in the incident who may return the assets.

    Trust with CoinPedia:

    CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

    Investment Disclaimer:

    All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

    Sponsored and Advertisements:

    Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

    Show More

    Related Articles

    Back to top button