News
  • Vignesh S G
    author-profile

    Vignesh S G right arrow

    Author

    Vignesh is a young journalist with a decade of experience. A proud alumnus of IIJNM, Bengaluru, he spent six years as a Sub-Editor for a leading business magazine, published from Kerala. His interest in futuristic technologies took him to a US-based software company specialising in Web3, Blockchain and AI. This stint inspired him to view the future of journalism through the lens of next generation technologies. Now, he covers the crypto scene for Coinpedia, uncovering a vibrant new world where technology and journalism converge.

    • 2 minutes read

    Trump Media’s Crypto Partner Accused of Token Fraud – Here’s What Happened

    Story Highlights
    • Crypto.com is accused of fraud after re-minting 70 billion CRO tokens, reversing a previous burn.

    • The re-minting decision, pushed through community voting dominated by Crypto.com, raises concerns about centralized control.

    • Comparisons to FTX, including shared connections and spending patterns, have surfaced, adding to scrutiny amid Crypto.com's partnership with Trump Media.

    Shortly after Crypto.com announced its partnership with Trump Media to launch crypto-based ETFs under the Truth.Fi brand, a major controversy erupted. What seemed like a routine business move has now turned into a storm of allegations, shaking trust in one of the biggest names in crypto.

    On-chain investigator ZachXBT has accused Crypto.com of secretly reissuing 70 billion CRO tokens that were supposedly burned in 2021 – a move that directly contradicts the companyโ€™s promise of a permanent token burn. If true, this could have serious implications for CROโ€™s value and the broader crypto market.

    So, what really happened? Is Crypto.com following in the footsteps of FTX? And does Trump Media even know about the alleged fraud? Hereโ€™s everything you need to know.

    Why This Matters

    In 2021, Crypto.com burned 70% of CROโ€™s total supply, reducing it from 100 billion to 30 billion.ย The move was meant to make the token more scarce and valuable.

    However, investigative journalist Laura Shin later revealed that Cronos Labs quietly re-minted those same 70 billion tokens for what they called a “new strategic reserve.”

    This revelation has angered many CRO investors. One long-time supporter criticized the move, saying, “A burn is a burn. Burned tokens shouldnโ€™t be brought back to life.”

    How Will This Affect CROโ€™s Value?

    Now that these tokens have been reintroduced, the total circulating supply of CRO stands at 27,408,853,450.

    Current market performance shows:

    • Market cap: $2.9 billion
    • Fully diluted valuation: $10.3 billion
    • Price decline since 2021 peak: Over 91%
    • One-year decline: 31.2%
    • Growth in the last seven days: 33.6%
    • Drop in the last 24 hours: 1.5%

    Experts warn that reintroducing these tokens could increase inflation, making CRO less scarce and lowering its value further.

    Is Trump Media Aware of the Allegations?

    ZachXBT suggests that Trump Media may not be aware of Crypto.comโ€™s alleged fraud. Regardless, CRO will be a key component of the Truth.Fi ETFs, alongside Bitcoin and traditional securities.

    However, the ETF plans still require regulatory approval before they can move forward.

    Crypto.comโ€™s Control Over the Voting Process

    Crypto.com was able to approve the re-minting of these tokens through a community voting process. However, many critics argue the process was unfair because Crypto.com controls over 80% of the voting power.

    Some believe the company is using this control to maintain power over CROโ€™s supply and price movements.

    Is Crypto.com the Next FTX?

    Crypto investigator TruthLabs has drawn comparisons between Crypto.com and FTX, the collapsed exchange.

    He points out several similarities:

    • Both were part of the now-defunct Silvergate Exchange Network.
    • Both controlled their own tokensโ€”FTX with FTT, Crypto.com with CRO.
    • Both spent large sums on sponsorships. FTX partnered with NBA teams, while Crypto.com secured naming rights for major arenas.
    • Both received early funding from Binance.

    TruthLabs also revealed that a Crypto.com Polygon address was originally funded by Binance, with blockchain data showing connections between the two companies on Ethereum and Polygon networks.

    These findings raise concerns that Crypto.com could be following the same risky path as FTX.

    What Happens Next?

    With these accusations gaining attention, Crypto.comโ€™s credibility is under threat. Many are now questioning whether regulators will intervene and whether Trump Media will rethink its partnership.

    For now, the future of CRO and Crypto.com remains uncertain.

    Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

    Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

    Show More

    Related Articles

    Back to top button