Advertise
- Zafar Naik
Zafar Naik
- Reviewed by:
Qadir AKQadir Ak is the founder of Coinpedia. He has over a decade of experience writing about technology and has been covering the blockchain and cryptocurrency space since 2010. He has also interviewed a few prominent experts within the cryptocurrency space.
- Dec 20, 2025 09:27 UTC
-
Are Banks Trying to Kill Stablecoin Rewards? 125 Crypto Groups Push Back
A coalition of 125 crypto groups is pushing back against U.S. Senate efforts that could tighten stablecoin rewards rules.
The dispute centers on whether Congress should expand the GENIUS Act’s ban beyond stablecoin issuers to platforms and apps.
Industry leaders warn that changing the rules now could hurt consumers and tilt payments back toward traditional banks.
A new policy fight is taking shape in Washington.
More than 125 crypto and fintech organizations, led by the Blockchain Association, have urged the U.S. Senate Banking Committee to reject efforts that would expand restrictions on stablecoin rewards under the GENIUS Act. The group warns that broadening the rules would hurt consumers, slow innovation, and give traditional banks an unfair edge.
The letter was sent this week to Senate Banking Chairman Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren, pushing back against proposals that seek to reinterpret the law’s ban on stablecoin “interest or yield.”
What the GENIUS Act Allows and What It Doesn’t
The GENIUS Act clearly prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest to token holders. But according to the coalition, Congress intentionally allowed platforms and third parties to offer lawful rewards and incentives.
“That distinction was not accidental,” the letter states, arguing that expanding the ban would “reopen a settled issue” and disrupt a carefully negotiated compromise.
Crypto groups say this is a fundamental change to how stablecoins can compete in payments.
Banks Warn of Deposit Risk – Crypto Pushes Back
Banking groups have argued that stablecoin rewards could drain deposits from the banking system and hurt lending, especially at community banks. Some estimates have projected potential deposit outflows of up to $6.6 trillion.
The coalition disputes those claims, pointing to a Charles River Associates study that found no evidence of disproportionate deposit outflows from community banks between 2019 and 2025.
They also note that banks currently hold about $2.9 trillion in reserves earning interest at the Federal Reserve, raising questions about whether deposit constraints are the real issue.
“Opposition to stablecoin rewards reflects protection of incumbent revenue models, not safety-and-soundness concerns,” the letter says.
Why Stablecoin Rewards Matter Now
With average checking account yields near 0.07% and savings accounts around 0.40%, the coalition argues that stablecoin rewards help platforms share value directly with users, especially in a higher-rate environment.
The group also warned that reopening the issue before GENIUS rules are even written could undermine confidence in crypto regulation.
“When Congress passes a bill, and it gets signed into law, if you can reopen it right away, you’ve got a question about how much certainty is that really bringing to the market,” said Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger.
This is an important fight for the industry. Stay tuned to Coinpedia for what’s next.
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!
Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.
FAQs
If rewards offered by wallets or platforms are restricted, users could lose access to incentives that lower transaction costs or offset inflation. This may reduce the appeal of using stablecoins for payments or savings compared to both traditional banks and overseas crypto platforms.
Any reinterpretation or amendment would likely emerge through committee markups, regulatory guidance, or future rulemaking once the GENIUS Act is implemented. That process could take months and may involve input from regulators like the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve.
Traditional banks could benefit from reduced competition for deposits, while crypto platforms and their users may face fewer choices and lower returns. The outcome also matters for regulators, as it sets a precedent for how flexible or rigid future digital asset laws will be enforced.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Yes 
No 
