Advertise
- Zafar Naik
Zafar Naik
- Reviewed by:
Qadir AKQadir Ak is the founder of Coinpedia. He has over a decade of experience writing about technology and has been covering the blockchain and cryptocurrency space since 2010. He has also interviewed a few prominent experts within the cryptocurrency space.
- Nov 07, 2025 11:58 UTC
-
$500M in Fake Transactions? Bittrex Bankruptcy Records Raise Major Red Flags
Bittrex’s bankruptcy filings reportedly include over $500 million in suspicious or fabricated crypto transactions.
The irregularities could distort creditor claims and delay payouts to former users.
The case adds to Bittrex’s long history of compliance failures and regulatory troubles.
Bittrex’s bankruptcy case seems to have got messier. A new analysis claims the exchange’s filings include over $500 million worth of suspicious and possibly fabricated crypto transactions and that could change how much creditors and customers eventually get back.
Regulatory researcher Pasha Onur, who reviewed the documents, told DL News, “Certain patterns in the filed documents immediately raised serious red flags.”
His findings point to tens of thousands of unlikely or repetitive transfers, including transactions that don’t make economic sense.
Thousands of Transactions Don’t Add Up
Onur’s review found more than 21,500 withdrawals that were below Bittrex’s own minimum withdrawal limit. The exchange charged a $35 minimum for withdrawals and added extra fees on top, yet somehow, these smaller transactions were still processed.
Even stranger, the filings show over 10,000 identical Bitcoin withdrawals – each for the exact same fractional amount, all on the same day.
DL News also found over 200 transactions tied to “LMC”, a token linked to LoMoCoin – a blockchain that stopped operating in 2021, two years before these supposed transactions happened.
“Our analysis of court documents and Bittrex hot and cold wallets reveals over $500 million in fabricated transactions filed with the bankruptcy court across multiple dockets,” Onur said.
What It Means for Customers and Creditors
If these transactions are fake or inaccurate, they could completely throw off how much money creditors are owed. Bittrex had about 1.6 million users when it filed for bankruptcy in May 2023 but fewer than 36,000 (less than 3%) actually submitted claims.
“If withdrawal transactions are fabricated, customer account balances are wrong, meaning creditor claim amounts are incorrect,” Onur explained. That could delay payouts and raise questions about whether some claims were miscalculated from the start.
Even the top 20 creditors list, used to determine payment priority, might be based on faulty data. Among those creditors is the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), owed $24 million from an old sanctions case.
A Pattern of Compliance Failures
This isn’t the first time Bittrex has run into trouble. Since launching in 2014, the exchange faced multiple regulatory issues for weak compliance practices.
In 2019, New York regulators rejected its license application, citing poor anti-money laundering controls and fake account names like “Elvis Presley” and “Donald Duck.”
In 2022, it was fined $53 million for processing $263 million in illegal transactions, and in 2023, it paid $24 million to settle SEC charges for operating an unregistered securities exchange.
With bankruptcy claims now closed and creditors still waiting, investigators are under pressure to find out what really happened inside Bittrex’s books.
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!
Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.
FAQs
Analysts found patterns pointing to over $500M in suspicious or possibly fabricated crypto transactions in the court filings.
Thousands of withdrawals break the exchange’s own limits, and many identical or outdated token transfers don’t match real blockchain activity.
If balances are wrong, creditor amounts may be miscalculated, which could delay payouts and force a review of submitted claims.
Investigators will review the questionable data, and any confirmed errors could reshape creditor priorities and extend the payout timeline.
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Yes 
No 
