News View Non-AMP

Ripple vs. SEC: Ripple Labs Fights Back Against SEC’s “Surprise” Witness

Published by
Nidhi Kolhapur

The legal battle between Ripple Labs Inc. and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) just took another dramatic turn. Ripple has filed a motion to strike new evidence submitted by the SEC, raising the stakes for both sides and leaving investors wondering what this means for the future of XRP.

Read on to find out the key details and why this wrinkle in the case matters.

A Timely Dispute

Ripple Labs has filed a motion to strike down the SEC’s newly introduced expert materials, alleging unfair play due to their late arrival. The SEC’s unveiling of expert testimony after the agreed remedies discovery deadline has stirred the pot of contention.

The bone of contention lies in the SEC’s unveiling of a new expert declaration and accompanying exhibits by Andrea Fox, an Assistant Chief Accountant in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. These materials aim to strengthen the SEC’s push for remedies and final judgment.

Hard-Hitting Response

Ripple contends that Fox’s input clearly extends beyond mere summarization of data, engaging in substantive accounting judgments without prior disclosure as an expert witness. “This is precisely the type of ‘sandbagging’ that Rule 37(c)(1) is designed to prevent,” Ripple’s legal team emphasized, citing Abraham v. Leigh as a precedent.

Also Read: Ripple Made Court Filling Pubic, says SEC’s $2Bn Penalty Demand is Unconventional

Expertise Under Scrutiny

During the legal proceedings, the SEC categorized Fox not as a factual or expert witness but as a “summary witness.” Ripple, however, argues that her deep dive into financial records and the application of specialized accounting knowledge squarely positions her as an expert witness, necessitating earlier disclosure as per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a). 

Ripple further highlights the procedural disadvantage caused by the SEC’s timing, lamenting the missed chance for thorough cross-examination of Fox’s findings and the presentation of a rebuttal report. They argue that this not only undermines their defense but also the integrity of the legal process.

A Call for Fairness

In response to these alleged injustices, Ripple Labs pushes for the striking of the late disclosure, citing the need to prevent any prejudicial impact on their defense and the legal proceedings’ integrity.

Read More: Is the Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit Holding XRP Price Back?

The plot thickens in Ripple vs. SEC. What’s your prediction for the outcome?

Nidhi Kolhapur

Nidhi is a Certified Digital Marketing Executive and Passionate crypto Journalist covering the world of alternative currencies. She shares the latest and trending news on Cryptocurrency and Blockchain.

Recent Posts

Is XRP Finally Free? What Ripple’s Settlement Means for Investors

After nearly four years of courtroom drama, Ripple Labs has decided to withdraw its cross-appeal…

June 28, 2025

BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF Surges Past S&P 500 Fund in Profits

BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF, called IBIT, is now making more money from trading fees than any…

June 28, 2025

Jerome Powell to Resign? Trump Eyes New Fed Leadership Amid Rate Clash

US President Donald Trump is frustrated with Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s resistance to cutting…

June 28, 2025

Forget XRP and XLM: This New Crypto Presale Could Change How We Pay Forever

For years, Ripple (XRP) and Stellar (XLM) have been talked about as the future of…

June 28, 2025

Robert Kiyosaki Predicts Silver Will Explode in July 2025, Not Bitcoin

Robert Kiyosaki, the bestselling author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, has a new message for…

June 28, 2025

Bitcoin Price Prediction for the Weekend—Will the Volatility Increase or the Price May Remain Stuck Around $107K?

The Bitcoin (BTC) price is currently hovering around $107,000, showing signs of consolidation after a…

June 28, 2025