News View Non-AMP

Ripple vs. SEC: Ripple Labs Fights Back Against SEC’s “Surprise” Witness

Published by
Nidhi Kolhapur

The legal battle between Ripple Labs Inc. and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) just took another dramatic turn. Ripple has filed a motion to strike new evidence submitted by the SEC, raising the stakes for both sides and leaving investors wondering what this means for the future of XRP.

Read on to find out the key details and why this wrinkle in the case matters.

A Timely Dispute

Ripple Labs has filed a motion to strike down the SEC’s newly introduced expert materials, alleging unfair play due to their late arrival. The SEC’s unveiling of expert testimony after the agreed remedies discovery deadline has stirred the pot of contention.

The bone of contention lies in the SEC’s unveiling of a new expert declaration and accompanying exhibits by Andrea Fox, an Assistant Chief Accountant in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. These materials aim to strengthen the SEC’s push for remedies and final judgment.

Hard-Hitting Response

Ripple contends that Fox’s input clearly extends beyond mere summarization of data, engaging in substantive accounting judgments without prior disclosure as an expert witness. “This is precisely the type of ‘sandbagging’ that Rule 37(c)(1) is designed to prevent,” Ripple’s legal team emphasized, citing Abraham v. Leigh as a precedent.

Also Read: Ripple Made Court Filling Pubic, says SEC’s $2Bn Penalty Demand is Unconventional

Expertise Under Scrutiny

During the legal proceedings, the SEC categorized Fox not as a factual or expert witness but as a “summary witness.” Ripple, however, argues that her deep dive into financial records and the application of specialized accounting knowledge squarely positions her as an expert witness, necessitating earlier disclosure as per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a). 

Ripple further highlights the procedural disadvantage caused by the SEC’s timing, lamenting the missed chance for thorough cross-examination of Fox’s findings and the presentation of a rebuttal report. They argue that this not only undermines their defense but also the integrity of the legal process.

A Call for Fairness

In response to these alleged injustices, Ripple Labs pushes for the striking of the late disclosure, citing the need to prevent any prejudicial impact on their defense and the legal proceedings’ integrity.

Read More: Is the Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit Holding XRP Price Back?

The plot thickens in Ripple vs. SEC. What’s your prediction for the outcome?

Nidhi Kolhapur

Nidhi is a Certified Digital Marketing Executive and Passionate crypto Journalist covering the world of alternative currencies. She shares the latest and trending news on Cryptocurrency and Blockchain.

Recent Posts

7 Best Meme Coins to Buy Now — APC Coin’s Deflationary Setup Catches Eyes with Neiro, Pepe Unchained, and More

What if the next big crypto boom isn't driven by Bitcoin or Ethereum, but by…

June 7, 2025

Top 7 Indicators That Ozak AI Is the Next Big Thing in AI Tokens

Convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain technology continues to reshape the crypto space, one…

June 7, 2025

A New Era Begins with FUNToken AI Agent

FUNToken launches a smart rewards bot — the first step toward building an AI agent…

June 7, 2025

The 6 Best Crypto Exchanges: Top Picks for Seasoned Pros in 2025

The crypto market of 2025 is now a full-blown financial arena where professionals, institutional traders,…

June 7, 2025

Analysts Say This New Crypto Is The Best Risk-To-Reward Play Over Dogecoin (DOGE)

Analysts are spotlighting Mutuum Finance (MUTM) as the best crypto to buy now, outshining Dogecoin…

June 7, 2025

Investors Are Moving Beyond Dogecoin (DOGE): Ruvi AI (RUVI) Emerges as the Smarter 2025 Altcoin Bet

Investors seeking more than speculative momentum are increasingly shifting their attention from Dogecoin (DOGE) toward…

June 7, 2025