CZ Admits He Still Doesn’t Fully Understand Strategy’s STRC Product

Former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has admitted that even after several attempts, he still does not fully understand Strategy’s new STRC financial product. Moreover, speaking about Michael Saylor’s increasingly sophisticated Bitcoin-backed financial strategy, CZ described the product as highly engineered and potentially too complex for many investors.

“I took multiple attempts trying to understand STRC. I don’t think I understand it fully,” CZ said. He acknowledged that he is not qualified to provide a detailed explanation of how the product works.

According to CZ, many modern financial products have become “too complex” and “over-engineered.” They often rely on several layers of leverage and structured financing. He added, “When this type of product becomes too complex, it becomes very hard to understand. Parts of it become black boxes.” As a result, in his view, excessive complexity makes it difficult for even experienced investors to properly evaluate the underlying risks.

“Michael Saylor Understands It Better Than I Do”

Despite his concerns, CZ emphasized that his comments were not directed at Michael Saylor personally. “Michael Saylor is obviously extremely smart,” he said. In addition, he added that Saylor has far greater expertise in public companies, capital markets, senior notes, and structured finance.

CZ explained that his own background is rooted in technology and entrepreneurship rather than traditional financial engineering. For this reason, products like STRC are more difficult for him to analyze. He also revealed that Saylor spent about 15 minutes explaining STRC before they spoke together at an event.

“If I Can’t Understand It, That Does Worry Me”

While acknowledging his limited expertise, CZ questioned whether the product may be too complicated for many investors. “If I can’t understand it… it does worry me that there may be a few other guys who don’t understand that either,” he said. For CZ, complexity itself represents an investment risk. This is because it reduces transparency and makes informed decision-making harder.

“The Market Overreacted When Strategy Sold 32 Bitcoin”

Although he could not comment on STRC’s structure, CZ defended Strategy after criticism over its sale of 32 BTC. He noted that the company holds nearly one million Bitcoin. This makes the transaction relatively insignificant. “At some point, he’s got to sell some Bitcoin,” CZ said. He added that companies must meet financial obligations such as paying dividends and managing their balance sheets. Also, he argued that the market often overreacts, portraying Saylor as either a hero or a villain instead of taking a balanced view.

“Bitcoin Might Not Be the Best Underlying Asset for Leverage”

CZ also questioned whether Bitcoin’s volatility makes it the ideal collateral for leveraged financial products. While he remains bullish on Bitcoin’s long-term prospects, he noted that the asset has historically experienced corrections of 50% to 80%. This increases the risks associated with highly leveraged structures. 

He stressed that his views are based on his limited understanding of STRC. However, he said he remains cautious about financial products that are difficult to fully explain or understand.