News View Non-AMP

BinanceUS Vs The SEC: Protective Order Referred to Magistrate Judge, What’s in Store?

Published by
Elena R

BinanceUS and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continue to unfold as the protective order motion by BinanceUS has been referred to Magistrate Judge Faruqui for resolution by Judge Amy Jackson. Here’s a look at the latest twists and turns in this legal battle.

A High-Stakes Legal Battle

Judge Amy Jackson has decided to put BinanceUS’s protective order motion over to Magistrate Judge Faruqui for a ruling. Now, BinanceUS has been caught in the web of bureaucracy, accusing the SEC of exceeding the boundaries of an agreed-upon consent order. I bet you can guess what they want: more control.

BinanceUS’s Plea: An Honest Request or Just More Legal Jargon?

BinanceUS is begging the court to:

  • Keep their CEO and CFO away from SEC’s endless depositions
  • Say no to the SEC’s wild demands that have nothing to do with the case at hand

Are these unreasonable requests? You decide.

Former SEC Chief’s Insightful Predictions

John Reed Stark, a former SEC chief, made several accurate predictions regarding the BinanceUS protective order and the referral to Magistrate Judge Faruqui. Stark believes that while the judge may grant most of the SEC’s requests, certain duplicative or overly broad requests may be eliminated.

He also ominously predicts an imminent U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuit against Binance, a move that could “throw a wrench” into the proceedings.

In a bold strategic move, Binance and CEO CZ previously unveiled plans to dismiss the SEC lawsuit, along with that of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). However, BinanceUS’s co-defendant status limits the chances of dismissal, leading to an agreement with the SEC to separate wallets, hardware, and teams.

Coinbase’s Parallel Battle with the SEC

Adding to the drama, Coinbase has filed a motion to dismiss the US SEC lawsuit, alleging that the regulator is overstepping its regulatory boundaries. Senator Cynthia Lummis even submitted an amicus brief supporting Coinbase.

Here’s a thought: maybe it’s time to ask whether all this regulation and litigation is helping the crypto companies or just feeding the beast of big government. You decide!

Elena R

Elena is an expert in technical analysis and risk management in cryptocurrency market. She has 10+year experience in writing - accordingly she is avid journalists with a passion towards researching new insights coming into crypto erena.

Recent Posts

Uber And XION Showcase Web3’s Advantage In User Acquisition

Customer acquisition is getting harder than ever for businesses of every size due to the…

April 2, 2025

Ethereum Price Struggles Amid Macroeconomic Uncertainty: Will ETH Rebound?

Amid the notable macroeconomic uncertainty caused by the tariff trade wars, Ethereum (ETH) price has…

April 2, 2025

$1.67B Stolen in Q1 2025 – Top Crypto Hacks Revealed!

The first quarter of 2025 was a rollercoaster for the crypto world. Governments pushed for…

April 2, 2025

Ethereum Price Prediction for Q2 2025—Will ETH Price See a Strong Recovery Past $2500?

After experiencing 4 red months in a row, the minor rise in the Ethereum (ETH)…

April 2, 2025

Bitcoin Funding Rates Turn Negative: What It Means for BTC’s Future

In the last 30 days, the Bitcoin market has dropped by around 9.7%. Currently, the…

April 2, 2025

Giorgi Shonia on Critical Steps if Crypto is to Succeed Long-Term

It’s 2025 and we’re pretty honest when we say that crypto has never been bigger.…

April 2, 2025