News View Non-AMP

South Korea Supreme Court Confirms Bitcoin Held on Exchanges Is Seizable Under Law

Published by
Debashree Patra and Nidhi Kolhapur

South Korea’s Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling that removes lingering legal uncertainty around cryptocurrencies held on centralized exchanges. In a landmark judgment, the court confirmed that Bitcoin stored in exchange accounts can be lawfully seized under the Criminal Procedure Act, firmly placing digital assets within the scope of criminal enforcement.

This decision strengthens the legal footing for investigators handling crypto-related crimes and reflects South Korea’s increasingly mature approach to regulating digital assets in a country where crypto adoption is already widespread.

The Case That Triggered the Ruling

As per the report, the ruling stems from a money laundering investigation dating back to 2020. At the time, police seized 55.6 Bitcoin, worth roughly 600 million Korean won, from an exchange account belonging to an individual identified as Mr. A. The seizure was carried out as part of an ongoing criminal probe.

Mr. A later challenged the action, arguing that Bitcoin held on an exchange could not be seized because it is not a physical object, as traditionally required under Article 106 of the Criminal Procedure Act. After lower courts rejected this claim, the case reached the Supreme Court for final review.

Why the Court Rejected the Appeal

In its ruling, the Supreme Court made it clear that seizure laws are not limited to tangible items. The court stated that assets subject to seizure include electronic information and digital representations of value, not just physical property.

The judges emphasized that Bitcoin has clear economic value and can be independently managed, transferred, and controlled by its owner, even when held on an exchange. Because users retain effective control over their assets through account access and private key systems, the court ruled that Bitcoin qualifies as a legitimate seizure target during criminal investigations.

The court concluded that the original seizure was lawful and that there was no error in the lower courts’ decisions to dismiss Mr. A’s objections.

Consistency With Past Crypto Rulings

This judgment builds on a series of earlier South Korean court decisions that have steadily defined the legal status of cryptocurrencies. In 2018, the Supreme Court recognized Bitcoin as intangible property that could be confiscated if acquired through criminal activity. That same year, crypto assets were also treated as divisible property in divorce cases.

In 2021, the court further clarified that Bitcoin constitutes a property interest under criminal law, reinforcing its status as a legally recognizable asset.

Crypto Implications

Legal experts say the latest ruling removes practical uncertainty around seizing digital assets held on exchanges and will serve as a reference point for future investigations and trials. With over 16 million South Koreans holding crypto accounts, the decision provides regulators and law enforcement with clearer authority while signaling that crypto assets are not beyond the reach of the law.

Globally, the move aligns South Korea with other jurisdictions, such as the UK, that are formally recognizing digital assets as property. Together, these developments point to a growing international consensus: cryptocurrencies are no longer operating in a legal gray zone but are firmly part of the established legal and financial system.

FAQs

Can South Korea legally seize Bitcoin held on crypto exchanges?

Yes. The Supreme Court ruled Bitcoin on centralized exchanges can be seized under criminal law, even though it is a digital, not physical, asset.

Could this decision influence how user assets are protected on exchanges?

Indirectly. While user protections remain intact for lawful activity, exchanges may strengthen monitoring and compliance systems to reduce legal and operational risks.

What does this mean for future crypto-related court cases in South Korea?

Courts are likely to rely on this ruling as precedent, reducing disputes over whether digital assets qualify for enforcement actions. This could shorten trial timelines in financial crime cases.

Are decentralized wallets or self-custodied crypto affected by this ruling?

Not directly. The decision applies to assets held on centralized exchanges, though it may inform future legal debates around self-custody and enforcement limits.

Debashree Patra and Nidhi Kolhapur

Fun-loving and cheerful, a passionate blockchain and crypto writer who knows no boundary…connect if you share the same passion. With 10+ years of writing experience, I am a Crypto Journalist by chance, exploring, and learning all the dynamics of the sci-fi action-filled crypto world. Currently, focusing on cryptocurrency news and price data. With a passion for research and challenging my capabilities, I am slowly getting into the crypto arena to bring new insights every day.

Trust with CoinPedia:

CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:

All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:

Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Recent Posts

Morgan Stanley and Citigroup Expects At Least 50Bps Fed Rate Cuts In 2026

The Federal Reserve is expected to continue with its interest rate cut in 2026, amid…

January 10, 2026

Ethereum Nears Breakout as $1 Billion in Liquidations Build — What’s Next for ETH Price?

Crypto markets entered the week expecting heightened volatility ahead of key macro triggers, including U.S.…

January 10, 2026

Bitcoin, Ethereum and XRP Prices Rise After US Supreme Court Delays Trump Tariff Ruling

Bitcoin, Ethereum and XRP prices moved higher on Thursday after the US Supreme Court delayed…

January 9, 2026

Ethereum Faces Rising Accumulation Cost Around $2.7K–$2.8K: Will Long-Term Buyers Push ETH Price?

Ethereum’s accumulation cost has increased and LTHs are concentrated around $2.7K–$2.8K price range. This is…

January 9, 2026

Could Charles Hoskinson’s Exit From Social Media Affect Cardano ADA’s Price?

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson said he is stepping away from social media, raising questions among…

January 9, 2026

Bitcoin Price Drops, Yet Long-Term Holders Aren’t Selling—Here’s Why

Bitcoin’s price has slipped from recent highs, breaking below key short-term levels and triggering renewed…

January 9, 2026