News View Non-AMP

MSCI Proposal Could Trigger $15B Crypto Sell-Off in Public Companies

Published by
Debashree Patra and Sohrab Khawas

A proposed rule change by MSCI is quickly becoming a major talking point across traditional finance and crypto markets. Analysts warn the move could trigger billions of dollars in forced selling, not just in stocks, but potentially spilling into Bitcoin itself. At the center of the debate is how crypto-heavy public companies are treated inside global equity indexes.

What Is MSCI Proposing and Why Does It Matter?

MSCI, one of the world’s most influential index providers, is considering excluding companies that hold more than 50% of their assets in digital assets from its Global Investable Market Indexes. The proposal was first floated in October and is still under consultation, with a final decision expected by January 15, 2026. If approved, changes would likely take effect in February 2026.

This is not a minor technical tweak. MSCI indexes guide trillions of dollars in institutional capital, meaning any reclassification can instantly reshape market flows.

Why Is the 50% Threshold So Controversial?

The core issue is how MSCI defines risk. The proposed rule relies purely on balance-sheet composition, not on how a company actually operates. Critics argue this rigid threshold ignores the reality of digital asset treasury strategies.

For firms like MicroStrategy, which holds over 671,268 BTC, Bitcoin is treated as a long-term treasury asset rather than a speculative trade. Yet under MSCI’s framework, a rise in Bitcoin’s price alone could push such companies past the 50% mark and lead to index removal, even if their business model hasn’t changed.

Forced Selling is possible, if..

Analysts believe the risk is real. Around 39 publicly listed companies with heavy crypto exposure, worth roughly $113 billion combined, are currently included in MSCI-linked indexes. If excluded, index-tracking ETFs and mutual funds would be forced to sell these stocks automatically.

Estimates suggest this could drive between $10 billion and $15 billion in outflows. JPMorgan has separately warned that excluding MicroStrategy alone could trigger about $2.8 billion in selling, highlighting how concentrated and sudden the impact could be.

Crypto-Linked Stocks Could Amplify BTC Volatility

Companies heavily invested in Bitcoin could push BTC markets into turbulence if equity selling intensifies. Analysts warn of a self-reinforcing cycle: falling share prices lead to more index exclusions, forced selling, and heightened volatility.

Institutional Crypto Adoption Could Slow

Beyond short-term volatility, industry participants worry the rule could slow institutional crypto adoption and undermine index neutrality, a core principle of passive investing. It may also invite regulatory scrutiny as policymakers continue debating how digital assets should be classified.

Even though the final decision is still months away, uncertainty is already creeping in. Stocks like MicroStrategy, Coinbase, and Bitcoin miners could face heightened volatility as markets price in the risk. The outcome could shape not only crypto-linked equities but also how digital assets fit into corporate balance sheets worldwide.

FAQs

Could companies restructure their balance sheets to avoid index exclusion?

Yes. Companies could reduce reported digital-asset exposure by raising cash, issuing debt, or shifting assets into operating subsidiaries, even if their core strategy remains unchanged. Such moves would be driven by index eligibility rather than business fundamentals, potentially distorting capital allocation decisions.

Could the proposal influence how companies account for digital assets?

Potentially. Firms may reconsider how and where digital assets are held or reported, especially if accounting classifications affect index treatment. This could accelerate lobbying for clearer global accounting standards for cryptocurrencies through bodies like the IASB or FASB.

What happens if MSCI delays or modifies the proposal after consultation?

If MSCI adjusts the threshold, adds grace periods, or introduces qualitative criteria, immediate market disruption could be reduced. However, prolonged uncertainty may still keep valuations volatile until final index rules are locked in and implemented.

Debashree Patra and Sohrab Khawas

Fun-loving and cheerful, a passionate blockchain and crypto writer who knows no boundary…connect if you share the same passion. With 10+ years of writing experience, I am a Crypto Journalist by chance, exploring, and learning all the dynamics of the sci-fi action-filled crypto world. Currently, focusing on cryptocurrency news and price data. With a passion for research and challenging my capabilities, I am slowly getting into the crypto arena to bring new insights every day.

Recent Posts

Vitalik Buterin Draws the Line: Ethereum Will Not Back ‘Just Any’ DeFi Project

The Ethereum Foundation has made one thing clear this week: it is not backing just…

February 25, 2026

Best Crypto Presale for 2026: Pepeto Could Turn a $6,000 Buy Into $300,000 as Backpack Exchange Offers Equity and Smart Money Rotates Into Real Utility

Backpack Exchange just announced that stakers of its token can earn actual equity in the…

February 25, 2026

Pi Network News: Founders Defend Vision as PI Crashes 94%, Say ‘We Are Nonconformist’

Pi Network is going through a rough stretch. PI is trading near $0.16, down more…

February 25, 2026

Crypto Market Today: Bitcoin and Ethereum Pump After Jane Street Lawsuit

The crypto market is flashing green today after days of pressure. Total market capitalization has…

February 25, 2026

‘We Designed XRPL So Ripple Could Not Control It’: David Schwartz Breaks Silence

A new debate is taking place in the crypto world after Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer,…

February 25, 2026

Meta Plans Another Stablecoin Launch in 2026 for Its Digital Payment Systems

Tech giant Meta Platforms Inc reportedly has plans to launch yet another dollar-backed stablecoin to…

February 25, 2026