Telegram’s temporary ban in India ahead of the NEET-UG re-exam has sparked a much larger controversy after Telegram founder Pavel Durov accused Reliance of interfering with Telegram access beyond India’s borders.
The dispute began after reports emerged that the Indian government temporarily restricted Telegram before the June 21 NEET-UG re-test over concerns that leaked exam papers and related content were being circulated on the platform.
According to reports, Telegram has moved the matter to the Delhi High Court, challenging the government’s decision.
Authorities reportedly took action after exam-related leaks were shared through Telegram channels before the re-examination. The government argued the move was necessary to protect the integrity of the exam process and prevent the spread of leaked materials.
However, Durov strongly disagreed with the decision.
“India’s IT ministry banned Telegram for one week because some users shared leaked exam questions,” he wrote on X.
According to Durov, the ban affects more than 150 million Telegram users in India while doing little to stop the people actually responsible for the leaks. “The leaks just moved to other apps,” he added.
CBSE whistleblower Nisarg Adhikary even commented on the issue and said that the government’s ban on apps like telegram will not solve paper leak claims. Users will find another way out.
The story escalated when Durov made a separate allegation against Reliance Industries.
He claimed Reliance used BGP hijacking to disrupt Telegram access. This affected users outside India, including the UAE.
“The sabotage seems intentional,” Durov wrote, adding that Reliance had allegedly ignored multiple reports about the issue. He also called on network operators worldwide to reject unauthorized routing announcements from Reliance.
Durov’s claims quickly triggered debate online. One user asked whether there was any technical evidence supporting the allegations.
Durov responded with a brief answer: “Plenty.”
He later stated that Telegram was escalating the matter with UAE telecom operator “du,” arguing that it was alarming if a telecom operator in India could allegedly affect internet access for users in another country.
Meanwhile, Reliance has not given any official comments on the matter.
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Bitcoin ETFs are buying again, but Bitcoin is moving in the opposite direction. U.S. spot…
Hyperliquid, a decentralized layer-1 blockchain, has opened its first permissionless HIP-4 deployments on testnet, giving…
TAO price has entered a multi-year demand zone, with the token currently trading around $196,…
Grayscale, a major digital asset management firm with $35 billion in assets under management (AUM),…
FIL price has slipped to around $0.664 in 2026, placing the token trading near its…
Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and XRP ended July on a cautious note after facing renewed…
