News View Non-AMP

Celsius Wins Key Round in $4 Billion Lawsuit Against Tether

Published by
Zafar Naik

Celsius Network just got the green light to take Tether to court over one of the biggest disputes in recent crypto history – a $4 billion lawsuit centered around the liquidation of Bitcoin during Celsius’s collapse in 2022.

A U.S. bankruptcy judge has allowed the case to move forward, rejecting major parts of Tether’s attempt to shut it down. The ruling could have lasting consequences for how global crypto firms are held accountable in U.S. courts, especially when billions are on the line.

Here are the deets.

Tether’s “Fire Sale” of Bitcoin Under Scrutiny

The case goes back to June 2022, when Celsius was already under pressure as crypto markets crashed. Tether, which had lent money to Celsius, allegedly sold over 39,500 BTC at an average price of $20,656, well below market value at the time. Celsius says this was done without proper notice AND in violation of a 10-hour waiting period that was part of their agreement.

Celsius claims this move not only broke their contract, but also amounted to fraudulent and preferential transfers under U.S. bankruptcy law. At today’s prices, Celsius says the early liquidation cost them over $4 billion worth of Bitcoin.

The BTC, according to court documents, was later moved to Bitfinex, Tether’s sister company.

Tether’s Jurisdiction Argument Fails

Tether tried to get the case dismissed, arguing that a U.S. court has no authority since the company is based in the British Virgin Islands and Hong Kong. But the judge disagreed.

The court found that Tether used U.S.-based personnel, bank accounts, and communications in its dealings with Celsius enough to consider the activity “domestic.” That ruling now opens the door for Celsius’s lawsuit to proceed in the U.S., even though Tether operates offshore.

Some lesser claims were dismissed, but the judge is allowing Celsius to pursue key charges – including breach of contract, fraudulent transfer, and preferential transfer.

Big Implications for Crypto Lending and Stablecoins

This isn’t just a courtroom fight between two crypto companies. The ruling could influence how similar cases are handled in the future especially when it comes to stablecoin issuers, asset custody, and cross-border lending practices.

If Celsius proves its claims, it could raise serious questions about how major players like Tether manage client assets during times of market stress.

While the legal battle continues, Tether isn’t slowing down. The company recently bought a majority stake in Twenty One Capital, a firm linked to Strike CEO Jack Mallers. With that move, Tether is now connected to the third-largest corporate Bitcoin holder in the world.

Tether also transferred nearly 37,230 BTC, worth about $3.9 billion, to addresses tied to the platform further strengthening its position in the Bitcoin market.

In the middle of all this, CEO Paolo Ardoino has dismissed talk of a Tether IPO. Even as speculation swirls over a possible $500 billion valuation, Ardoino said the company has “no plans” to go public.

What’s Next?

The case now heads to the next phase, with Celsius aiming to hold Tether accountable for what it sees as a massive breach of trust. 

We’ll keep you updated on how this plays out – right here on Coinpedia. 

FAQs

What exactly did Tether do wrong in the Bitcoin liquidation, and how did it violate the agreement with Celsius?

Celsius alleges Tether conducted a “fire sale” of over 39,500 BTC without proper notice and below market value, violating a 10-hour waiting period specified in their agreement. Celsius claims this breached their contract and constituted fraudulent and preferential transfers under U.S. bankruptcy law, costing them over $4 billion.

How does the court’s ruling on U.S. jurisdiction affect other offshore crypto companies?

The court’s ruling, which found U.S. jurisdiction over Tether despite its offshore base due to “domestic” activities (U.S.-based personnel, bank accounts, communications), sets a significant precedent. It suggests that offshore crypto companies with substantial operational or transactional links to the U.S. may be subject to U.S. legal scrutiny and accountability, regardless of their official incorporation location.

Zafar Naik

Zafar is a seasoned crypto and blockchain news writer with four years of experience. Known for accuracy, in-depth analysis, and a clear, engaging style, Zafar actively participates in blockchain communities. Beyond writing, Zafar enjoys trading and exploring the latest trends in the crypto market.

Recent Posts

Bitcoin Price Has Been Correcting for 159 Days, But Is That Really a Problem?

Bitcoin peaked at $126,230 on October 6. It has been falling for 159 days since.…

March 14, 2026

Cardano Price Stabilizes as ADA Flashes Bullish Signal Amid Crypto Market Rally

Cardano price is approaching a potentially critical moment as the broader crypto market rally begins…

March 14, 2026

Why a High XRP Price Is Good for Holders and Essential for Banks

XRP is trading at $1.39 today, down 63% from its peak. And while most holders…

March 14, 2026

CapPlace Review: Key Findings, Unlocking Opportunities in CFD Trading

CapPlace is a relatively leading trading platform that has gained significant attention in recent years.…

March 14, 2026

AlgoBI Trading Platform Review 2026 – Complete Overview for Traders

In Brief Regulated multi-asset CFD platform operated by DXA Seychelles Limited, licensed by the FSA…

March 14, 2026

Avalanche Price Drops Below $10 — Why Is AVAX Falling Today?

The Avalanche (AVAX) price has dropped below the key $10 psychological level, reflecting continued selling…

March 14, 2026