News View Non-AMP

Can Prediction Markets Turn Dangerous? Vitalik Buterin Weighs In

Published by
Zafar Naik and Qadir AK

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is weighing in on a growing debate surrounding prediction markets, drawing a clear line between what he views as useful and what he considers dangerous.

The discussion unfolded after Buterin defended prediction markets as a better way to measure uncertainty than social media or even traditional financial markets. His core argument: prediction markets reward accuracy, not loud opinions.

“On social media, lots of people talk about ‘THIS WAR WILL DEFINITELY HAPPEN’ and scare people,” Buterin wrote. “With prediction markets, if you make a dumb bet, you lose.”

Why Vitalik Says Prediction Markets Get a Bad Rap

Critics often argue that prediction markets could incentivize harmful behavior by allowing people to profit from disasters. Buterin pushed back, saying those risks already exist, and at much larger scale, in traditional markets.

Many of the downsides of PMs are replicated by regular stock markets,” he said, noting that equities and other financial instruments offer far more liquidity for anyone trying to profit from chaos.

In contrast, prediction markets force people to back their beliefs with money. Over time, wrong views get filtered out. Prices reflect probabilities, not certainty – something Buterin says helps him personally stay calm when headlines turn sensational.

Will Markets Shape Reality?

The debate intensified after a user suggested that highly liquid prediction markets could eventually stop predicting outcomes and start shaping them. With enough capital, they argued, markets could “program reality to follow the market.”

Buterin didn’t agree and said that future worries him.

“I actually consider that one of the danger cases,” he responded.

Where Vitalik Draws the Line

According to Buterin, markets that shape reality tend to benefit large players over small ones. Governments, corporations, and whales can move outcomes, but regular users can’t. That imbalance already exists in traditional finance, and it’s often harmful.

Prediction markets, he argued, are safer precisely because they’re smaller.

Their size limits their influence. Prices stay bounded between 0 and 1, reducing bubbles, manipulation, and “greater fool” dynamics.

“They are much less dominated by reflexivity effects,” he said, calling them “healthier” than regular markets.

FAQs

Could prediction markets still encourage unethical behavior?

While any market can create incentives to profit from negative events, the limited scale of prediction markets means they are less likely to reward widespread harmful actions. Large players like corporations or governments have far more power in traditional markets to exploit such opportunities.

Who benefits most from prediction markets?

Individual users and small-scale traders benefit by accessing a platform where accurate information and careful analysis are rewarded. Unlike in conventional finance, outcomes are less dominated by whales or institutional investors, giving ordinary participants a more level playing field.

What are the potential risks if prediction markets grow significantly?

If a prediction market becomes extremely liquid or large, it could gain the capacity to influence the real world, rather than just forecast it. This scenario could favor those with substantial capital, creating the same power imbalances seen in traditional financial systems.

Zafar Naik and Qadir AK

Zafar is a seasoned crypto and blockchain news writer with four years of experience. Known for accuracy, in-depth analysis, and a clear, engaging style, Zafar actively participates in blockchain communities. Beyond writing, Zafar enjoys trading and exploring the latest trends in the crypto market.

Trust with CoinPedia:

CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:

All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:

Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Recent Posts

Belarus Establishes Crypto Bank Framework Under National Bank Supervision

Belarus has formally legalized crypto banks, marking a notable shift in how the country approaches…

January 16, 2026

Stellar XLM Price Prediction 2026,2027-2030: Future Price Analysis and Investment Potential

Story Highlights The live price of the Stellar crypto is XLM price could reach a…

January 16, 2026

TRON Price Holds Firm After Breakout: Why TRX is Standing Out Now?

TRON (TRX) is showing inherent strength and is holding firm after rising higher in this…

January 16, 2026

XRP Ranks Among Most Searched Cashtags on X

XRP has become one of the most searched cashtags on X, showing growing interest in…

January 16, 2026

CME Group to Launch Cardano (ADA), Chainlink (LINK), and Stellar (XLM) Futures in February

CME Group, the world’s largest derivatives marketplace, is set to broaden its crypto product lineup…

January 16, 2026

Is the CLARITY Act Protecting Banks? Coinbase’s Exit Reignites Debate

Coinbase’s decision to withdraw support for the US CLARITY Act has reignited tensions across the…

January 16, 2026